Wanderings: Survey shows 75 percent of Pennsylvanians want an end to pigeon shoots
Three-fourths of all Pennsylvanians want to see an end to live pigeon shoots.
A statewide survey by the Mason-Dixon Polling and Research Company reveals not only do 75 percent of Pennsylvanians want to see legislation to ban live pigeon shoots but only 16 percent of Pennsylvanians oppose such a ban.
Here's another figure from that independent survey. Eighty-three percent - that's more than four of every five Pennsylvanians - say live pigeon shoots are an unnecessary form of animal cruelty.
Organizers of this blood sport place the birds into cages, and place people with shotguns only about 20 yards away. The spring-loaded cages open, and the pretend hunters open fire. The pigeons, many of them stunned, often having been nearly starved, are then blown apart.
But first they suffer. More than 70 percent of all birds are wounded, according to data compiled by the Humane Society of the United States. If they fall onto the shooting range, teenagers take the birds, wring their necks or use scissors to cut their heads off, and stuff them into barrels. Even if the birds survive strangulation, they will die from their wounds and from suffocation. If the wounded birds manage to fly outside the shooting range, most will die a lingering and painful death. The juveniles-disguised-as-adults consider the birds litter, and don't pick them up if they fall outside the shooting range.
Most hunters agree live pigeon shoots is cruelty. Most hunters rightfully say this is not fair chase hunting. Most hunters want to see this practice come to an end. And they have every right to want this to happen - pigeon shoots make a mockery of everything legitimate hunting stands for, and gives anti-hunting activists a huge target.
None of the birds can be used for food. Nor is there any way to make fur coats from their feathers.
Pennsylvania's trap and skeet shoots attract many of the best shooters from around the country, and are a justifiably family-friendly sport. In contrast, pigeon shoots attract an assortment of barely-mediocre shooters, most of whom mix shooting and drinking, and openly violate the state's gambling laws. Ted Nugent, who justifiably lives up to his "Motor City Madman" label, actively promotes pigeon shoots.
More than a century ago, the International Olympic Committee banned pigeon shooting as cruel, and declared it wasn't a sport. Almost no country allows pigeon shoots. Pennsylvania is the only state that officially condones this practice.
So, if three-fourths of all Pennsylvanians want to see a ban on pigeon shoots, who doesn't?
The Pennsylvania legislature doesn't. In almost three decades, the leaders have blocked almost every attempt to put legislation up for a vote. The last time there was a free-standing bill was in 1989.
And why has Pennsylvania's often-dysfunctional legislature not followed the will of the people and banned this cruelty?
It's an easy answer. Politicians are ruled not by the people who elect them but by who spreads money and fear onto their souls. In this case, the NRA executives - not the membership, almost all of whom believe in fair chase hunting, but the executives - don't want to see the end of pigeon shooting. They stupidly and wrongly claim that banning pigeon shooting violates the Second Amendment. They stupidly and wrongly claim that banning pigeon slaughter is a slippery slope to the overthrow of gun rights.
Pennsylvania's part-time legislators who receive full-time pay buy into this because they have been bought by the NRA - and they are afraid if they get even a grade of "B" from the NRA it might affect their chances of re-election.
This legislative session, Sen. Pat Browne (R-Allentown), the Senate's majority whip, sponsored a bill (SB 510) to ban pigeon shoots. He has 22 co-sponsors; among them are Sen. Dominic Pileggi (R-Glen Mills, Pa.), the majority leader, and Sen. Jay Costa (D-Pittsburgh), the minority floor leader. Browne also has the support of the Pennsylvania Bar Association, the Pennsylvania Council of Churches, the Pennsylvania Veterinary Medical Association, the ASPCA, and the Pennsylvania Federation of Humane Societies.
Even if the Senate passes the bill, the vote in the House will be contentious - its leaders have been the primary blocks to keep the bill from a vote.
If our Jello-spined legislators will look at the will of the people, they will stand up to the NRA executives, vote for Browne's bill to ban pigeon shoots, and bring Pennsylvania into line with all other states that can make a distinction between Second Amendment rights and animal cruelty.